Monthly archives: September, 2019

Bourdain’s Search for the Perfect Meal

In memory of the American celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain

25 June 1956 – 8 June 2018

a review on A Cook’s Tour, 2001

The perfect meal. What is it? For our purposes, the word is ‘complete’.  A perfect meal lacks nothing, it is complete. On the other hand, any meal whatsoever is complete insofar as it satisfies our hunger. But we are not talking about any meal whatsoever. Perhaps if we journeyed to New York City to dine at Les Halles, the restaurant of executive chef Anthony Bourdain, we would experience the ‘perfect meal’ and our sophisticated demands for this ultimate of all meals would be met.

For his part, Tony Bourdain says in his most recent book, A Cook’s Tour (2001) ‘I wanted the perfect meal’ and ‘I wanted adventures’ in the style of Graham Greene and Kim Philby. He also says: ‘I wanted to see the world …I wanted the world to be just like the movies’.

The search, however, fails in this last respect, because unlike the characters in Greene’s novels or in the espionage of Philby, he is accompanied by a television crew in preparation for a cook programme once he returns from his worldly travels back in the United States. In his addition, there is no room in this adventure for the traditional love affair and its complex uncertainties given Nancy, his wife, is always in his mind if not with him on the food trail.

The first taste

Bourdain, nevertheless, knows that the magic which must accompany the perfect meal will not be found if the meal cannot be remembered: ‘No one remembers their best meal ever as being consumed jacketed and tied in a standard dress shirt sitting bolt upright in a four-star restaurant’. What is remembered is the first taste, the first ‘sensory memory’, a simple taste such as a ‘single slab of sacred foie gras or a single wild strawberry’.

Why, for instance, is French food considered the best in the world? Bourdain’s simple answer is, ‘…because they use everthing’. This is also true, according to Bourdain, for the kitchens of Vietnam, Portugal, Mexico and Morocco. These kitchens, their environment and the people who inhabit them, will be the prime subjects of his search for the perfect meal.

This is not to say that meals in the Basque region of Spain, Japan, England and the United States, are not ‘fantastic’’ or ‘sensational’ or ‘best in the world’, it is just that meals here are generally of food that has been transformed or refined from what it was at the source.

Slaughter, smells and insights

Bourdain’s search for the perfect meal is given to us in the first person narrative. It is lively, pungent, politically incorrect and sometimes quite dramatic. He gives us a bird’s eye view of the location in the country visited as well as the people directly involved including their habits, wishes and memories. He is most interesting when providing an account of the purpose of the visit, the meal.

His visit to the farm of Bourdain’s co-chef Jose Meirelles in Portugal is a good case in point. Here, the scene is set by the predominate smell in the air, ‘wood and smoke’. The dinner revolves about the pig and the slaughter, which makes Bourdain squeamish. Every part of the pig is offered for consumption during the dinner, nothing is wasted. In this sense, the meal is complete. The agony of the slaughter, however, makes Bourdain realize there is more to the perfect meal than a sanitized design kitchen in New York: ‘I am more confirmed than ever in my love for pork, pork fat and cured port. And, I am less likely to waste it in future.’

His return to the beaches of the Gulf of Biscay in Southwest France is ostensibly to find the perfect food, the oyster, ends in disappointment not because of the oyster, but because he realizes his journey here was actually to find his departed father, and in this he failed. Bourdain grew up in this area of France.

Bourdain is at his best when talking about Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon) in Vietnam. This is also true for visits to locations in Cambodia, Mexico Scotland, Russia and Morocco. In the land of couscous, tajine and brochette, Morocco where the prevailing smell is oleander, and the ingredients garlic, cilantro, onion, mint, cumin, cinnamon, tomato, salt and pepper, the sometimes maverick chef finds the taste of testicles quite ‘sensational’.

Further exotic dishes at the simple taste level can be found during his stay in St. Petersburg where the ‘borscht was sensational’, in Morocco where the pigeon pie was wonderful’, in Cambodia where the durian fruit was ‘fantastic’, in Scotland where the haggis (seep guts and oatmeal) was ‘delicious’ and in Saigon where the taste of the live heart of a cobra was ‘not much of one’.

Refined cuisine and simple food

This contrast between transformed and refined cuisine in our restaurants, on the one hand, and simple food which is eaten in order to live, a need, is no more sharply put than in Bourdain’s comments on his visits to San Sebastian in the Basque country of Spain and to the restaurant the French Laundry of Thomas Keller in the Napa Valley wine country about Yountville, just northeast of San Francisco.

The Basque chef Juan Marie Arzuk offered Bourdain ‘one of the best meals [I] have ever had’, in that, ‘presentation represented the food to best effect and never distracted from the ingredients. The Basque elements were always front and center.’ The contrast with simple food is made again at the French Laundry where the meal consisted of twenty courses and took six-and-a -half hours. Keller, ‘a legendary perfectionist’, supplied Bourdain and his three friends, the chefs Scott Bryan of Veritas in New York and Eric Ripart of Le Bernardin in New York plus the co-author of Keller’s cookbook, Michael Ruhlman, with an ‘absolutely awe-inspiring meal’.

A Cook’s Tour is an immensely readable travelogue in the search for the perfect meal. Does Bourdain experience the perfect meal? As Keller himself said, according to Bourdain, ‘Perfect is something you never actually attain…It’s something you search for. Once you reach it, it’s not perfect. You’ve lost it. It’s gone.’ This is another way of saying that you are not aware of experiencing perfection, or completion, until it disappears. But isn’t it possible to know when you are in heaven when that is where you are?

A Cook’s Tour (274 pages) is published by CCCO, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers, and can be obtained in the Netherlands at the several American Discount bookstores at discount prices.


Directions (Posoki)

A suicide in Bulgaria

Posoki (Directions) is an intriguing road movie which gives us a bleak outlook on present day Bulgaria. A taxi driver is bribed at the bank. He kills the banker and himself. Five colleagues and their customers react on this while driving from A to B and listening to the radio, covering this news and holding a national radio debate on the Bulgarian society. They all move through the night, hopefully towards some more light.

director: Stephan Komandarev
cast & crew: Vasil Banov, Ivan Barnev, Assen Blatechki
year: 2017 (in cinema: 2019)
genre: realistic drama
runtime: 01.43 minutes


The American Dream – part 2

The American Dream, Kunsthalle Emden, Germany

Kunsthalle Emden Drents Museum, Assen – the Netherlands & the Kunsthalle, Emden – Germany 19-11-2017 – 27 May 2018

The exhibition The American Dream now being shown in Assen, the Netherlands and Emden, Germany, is a cooperative project whereby an attempt is being made to clarify ‘variants of realism’ and to demonstrate how the artists interpret ‘The American Dream’. The Drents Museum concentrates on American realism from 1945 to 1965, while Kunsthalle Emden is primarily devoted to American realistic art from 1965 to the present.

After a visit to the Drents Museum in Assen (see review The American Dream 1) it was time to go to the Kunsthalle in Emden. Looking through the trees with their green leaves, a brightly lit arrow on the façade of the museum lit up, almost beckoning us to come in. This is the place to be, it seemed to say, and indeed, it was. The entire exhibition will be a wake-up-call for many, including for Americans themselves, as realism as an art form has taken second place on the American art scene to abstract expressionism.

The curators have prepared visitors well with an excellent introduction to the show by selecting several works which serve as guideposts to the exhibition as a whole. The choice of Edward Hopper (1882-1967) and Andrew Wyeth (1917-2009) as the primary representatives of American realism was made with the recognition their works provide a standard upon which to view the exhibition as a whole. With their realistic work they stand out against abstract expressionism, photography, photorealism and hyperrealism.

Hopper and Wyeth: light

In the first gallery Hopper Hopper is represented by his ‘Girl at a Sewing Machine’ (1921) and Wyeth by ‘Blue Door’ (1952) and ‘Lovers Study’ (1981). Both artists have placed their figures in natural sunlight shining through a window with accompanying shadows. Hopper’s light is subdued, whereas Wyeth’s is sometimes extremely bright.

The girl in Hopper’s painting ‘Girl at a Sewing Machine’ seems to be completely absorbed by her sewing, while Wyeth’s nude woman in ‘Lovers Study’ is obviously posing for the artist who shows details like the light stroking her pubic hair and thighs and part of her left ear sticking out through her tight braids. Hopper, with a touch of impressionism, concentrates on form, while Wyeth shows a different kind of precision and explicitness. Both paintings are fabulous, especially as they implicitly seem to tell us something about their makers.

Wyeth’s painting, ‘Blue Door’, approaches abstract expressionism, but it remains a realistic door reflecting sunlight from a nearby window in a ramshackle barn.  Here the sunlight is quite dim when compared to ‘Lovers Study’. The light falls against the door and woodwork in varying shades of blue. The place seems to be cold and gloomy, yet we want to be there. The window within the brownish sill must be hard to open. Yet, this is exactly what we want to do. We almost feel the wind and hear the wooden floor creak. It is the intimacy of the barn that draws us in.

Both Wyeth and Hopper want us to recognize what they are depicting, although their work is mysterious at the same time. They share a love for the cinema, which often shows in Hopper’s work where we view a frame, as it were, from a film strip. These picture frames are often interpreted in terms of such moods as alienation and loneliness.

Larry Rivers

The introductory room further includes work by Larry Rivers, John French Sloan, John Koch and Charles Steeler. Larry Rivers’ work (1923-2003) is considered to be a bridge between Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art. His ‘Double Portrait of Berdie’ is an early work not yet reflecting his venture into Pop Art.  This painting was regarded by some as a ‘shocking female portrait’. He was criticized for ‘his crude depiction of his aging mother-in-law’. She sits and stands by a bed with vaguely flowery sheets, her big hallux valgus toes sticking out and growing over the other toes. It is a realistic and somewhat impressionistic depiction of a naked older woman. Not shocking now, but at the time apparently it was.

According to Andy Warhol, ‘Larry’s painting style was unique and it wasn’t Abstract Expressionism and it wasn’t Pop Art.  It fell into a period in-between. But his personality was very Pop’. Warhol also said Rivers was ‘the daddy of ‘Pop Art’ and called him ‘so chic’. The inspiration worked both ways, for Rivers had encouraged Warhol to paint everyday commercial objects. Don’t we all know Warhol’s vague representation of a camel on the Camel cigarette packet?

City Life: order and chaos

In connection with the exhibition John Koch: Painting a New York Life, Grady Turner says in an essay for the New-York Historical Society that ‘there is a studied informality’ to ‘The Forbes Family Portrait’ (1956) by John Koch (1909-1978). The family, two parents with their four children, are on their patio at the side of their swimming pool on what apparently is a cloudy day as there are no shadows to be seen. With respect to this oil-based painting, the modernist Koch explains ‘what is more important than whether there is or is not someone posing for you is the relationship between them’.

What is it then? At first sight the painting looks like a photograph with a very serious family gazing in the lens, the mother even appearing quite anxious. They all seem to be so organized, so quiet. No children’s chattering, no stains or spots, no smiles, no interaction. Both literally and figuratively, there are no ripples in the water.  Is this why this intriguing and detailed painting also makes us feel slightly uncomfortable? His pictures celebrate refinement—of material, of craftsmanship, of manners and, so far as a silent art can do so, of social speech”. This work by Koch leads us to work by the artist Edward Melcarth (1914-1972) who was friends with Malcolm Forbes. Moreover, Forbes was apparently his benefactor.

One could easily say that Melcarth was the antithesis of  The American Dream, when it comes to sexuality and politics.  He was an explicit homosexual and his adherence to Communism was accompanied by a ‘sensitive, emotional and heroic portrayal of the male working class figure’.  His painting, called ‘Private Worlds’ (no date), depicts three men splayed out over the table, probably after having taken drugs. On the table are a teaspoon and an open pocket match box. They look exhausted and disheveled and we can see only one man’s face. He has his eyes closed and actually looks like a boy, which makes the scene even more disconcerting. We see the young men in their colorful t-shirts from above: a panoramic view, a form which is often used to zoom in on beauty, thus reinforcing the focus on quite another side of city life.

E. Melcarth, Private Worlds

The room, entitled City Life, also includes four small rectangular oil-on-canvas paintings by Dee Shapiro (1936 – ), which present an overview of a city under the title, amongst others, ‘View from White Street’ (2000).

City Life is also a theme of the photographer Bill Rauhauser (1956) in depicting life in his home town of Detroit. In one of the eight photographs, ‘Stone Burlesk’ (1960), a nun and a rather plump woman with a very low bosom, a stiff handbag and very practical shoes are standing before strip joint entitled, Stone Burlesk. They stand out against a background with the phrases ‘World’s Hottest Strippers’ and ‘you must be 18 or over to enter’.  We cannot help smiling.

 

B. Rauhauser, Stone Burlesk

The City Life room of the show also focuses on such urban photorealist artists as Latvian-American Vija Celmins’(1938 – ) ‘Tulip Car’ (1966), ‘Scotton Inn’ by Robert Kniewek (1951- ), ‘A Bend in the Road’ (2003/04) by Stone Roberts, ‘Potrero Golf Legacy’ (2012) by Robert Bechtle, ‘116th Street’ (1992) by Daniel Greene (1934-), ‘Saturday Evening: Summer’ (2009) by John Moore (1941 – ), ‘Coffee’ by Max Ferguson (1959 – ) and a photorealism picture of a movie theatre featuring the film ‘Goodbye, Norma Jean’ entitled  ‘Martin Theatre, Harrison Avenue, Panama City Florida (1976) by Stephen Shore (1947  – ).  Shore’s work is a chromogenic color print.

Countryside

Moving to the Countryside Gallery there are six oil-on-canvas works, one in acrylic, one in chromogenic print and one in gelatin silver. Kurt Knoblesdorf’s (1979 – ) oil, entitled ‘Naval Yard’ (2009), appears to be a tottering two-story white house with a brownish colored roof over a long front porch. The object is set with a dark blue sky background, a lone tree to its side and a dark yard in front. Robert Birmelin’s (1933 – ) ‘Metaphysical Rock Group’ (1970) is a rock-covered beach on a lake which fades into a hilly horizon on the other side and a hazy sky.

Neil Gavin Welliver’s (1929-2005) ‘Snow on Alden Brook’ (1983) shows a small stream, a lot of snow, both depicted by strong brushstrokes and subtle dollops of paint, brownish trees trunks cutting through all of this whiteness. Welliver had begun by painting nature as directly observed. Later he says about his paintings of the Maine woods that it was ‘not  light in the normal sense, light bathing objects, but light in the air, flashing and moving like a flow of energy through space’ and that this is what his paintings are about.

Intriguing

Nicole Eisenman (1965 – ) presents us with an intriguing ‘Long Distance’ (2015), a work which keeps us talking as to what is going on. We see two figures, one looking at the other who is looking back from a screen. The one we see from the back is wearing a red and black hunter’s shirt and tennis shoes plus a baseball cap, feet with sneakers on the table on the left of the screen, while the right hand is holding a mug. We only see the eyes, hair and feet of the other person, who is apparently lying on a bed. Boy – girl? Girl – boy? Two boys? Two girls? The suggestion is that this could be anybody: us, our children, our neighbors. The screen in the middle of the painting is like a frame within a frame, almost like a prison. Form and content seem to reinforce each other and breathe a sense of loneliness, almost as if to say: is this how we communicate?

N. Eisenman, Long Distance

In the hyper-realistic work ‘Market Basket Harley’ (2007) by Tom Blackwell (1938), we see a Milwaukee-made Harley Davidson in all its glory standing idly aside a sign announcing a number of food products such as pizzas, gourmet foods and organics.

Blackwell says: ‘I have discovered that translating the image from the photograph requires the most intense discipline and that limiting the arena of self-expression also refines it…the photograph is a tool which enables me to freeze the ‘ordinariness’ I am after, one which helps me to achieve the veracity that makes it possible to capture the ineffable in the commonplace’. Blackwell says he is devoted to the total appropriation of the object, in this case the motorcycle.  This is a protest against those artists who are satisfied with a partial presentation of the object.

Genre and still life

Moving on to the room, named Genre, we have a work in pencil entitled ‘Hillary Clinton’ (2016) by Karl Haendel (1976). It is a huge photorealistic portrait (261 by 434.3 cm) of the recent presidential candidate in what seems to be a somewhat perturbed mood.

It cannot be a coincidence that, further in Genre, Peter Saul’s (1934 – ) ‘Quak-Quak, Trump’(2017), a portrait of the current president, is on the opposite wall: a huge, cartoon-like setting (198.1 by 304.8 cm) together with surrealistic duck-like heads sprouting out of a floating hamburger with boxing gloves, hitting Trump’s head.  There are also a few little ducks squirming in his voluminous hair that he tries to shoot. Sometimes successfully, considering the blood drops splashing around.

In the Still Life category, the Emden Kunsthalle rooms exhibit ten American artists with heavy concentration on new artistic styles of photorealism and hyperrealism, developed during and after the 1960s.  Charles Bell (1935-1995), for instance, is represented by his hyper-realistic pastel ‘Before the Journal’ (1986).  In sharp detail, he shows three cartoon-like figures – a monkey in costume on a tricycle, a toy clown on a wooden horse and another dressed-up monkey on a red toy car.  Further, the hyper-realist work ‘Queen’ (1976) by Audrey Flack (1931 –   ) is enamored by odds and ends sitting on a dressing table. She uses acrylic paint to show in richer than life colors, among others, a locket, a chess piece, a rose, the queen from a deck of cards, an old-fashioned pocket watch and a slice of an orange.

Few if any kiosks are so neatly stacked as Ken Keeley’s ‘Newsstand’ (1989). Keeley (1946 – ), which displays magazines, newspapers, candy bars, lottery tickets, each particular item clearly shown for all to see, included – of course – The New York Daily News, The New Yorker Magazine, Forbes Magazine and Life Magazine with a full page picture of the actor Clark Cable starring in ‘Gone with the Wind’.

Hyperrealism, partially because Abstract Expression shows little and impressionism only suggestively so, is an attempt to make everything absolutely clear – not merely to imply or infer.  Ralph Goings’ ‘A1 Sauce’ (1995) is a good example of this style, especially because it portrays an everyday meal’s consummation product.

Catalogue

The catalogue also includes two oil paintings by Alice Neel (1900-1984), a portrait of Raphael Soyer (1970) shown in Assen, and a still-life ‘Black Bottles’ (1977) at Emden.  The still-life is limited to wine bottles together with a bowl of apples sitting on a tannin-colored table top in a fragment of a white-colored room and hallway all set off by a reddish floor. The still-life is somewhat of an anomaly as the greater part of Neel’s oeuvre consists of portraits. At first she concentrated on nude females and later in her career on personalities she encountered in Greenwich Village and Harlem in New York. Not only are her portraits  characterized as possessing an ‘intense humanity’, but also, according to Victoria Miro in The Guardian, ’a unique window on the changing world in Harlem in the years before and after civil rights’.  She provided us, says Miro,‘with a true picture of urban life in Manhattan’.

A not too minor criticism with respect to the catalogue is the failure to provide page numbers of paintings by the artists in the index.

Time to relax

Last but certainly not least, the Tiffany Lounge with its reading table, glass lamps, special Tiffany windows, art-deco chairs, sherry glasses almost tempted us to pick up one of the books and relax. However, it was not until we entered the diner that we took time to catch our breath. We sat down on the red-white seats at a white table with silver chrome legs, while watching films about feminism and other movements in the 1960s and 1970s.

The timeline on the wall is not only accurate, but also looks playful and appealing because of its form. Protruding wooden blocks with historic events written on them, all ‘hanging’ on blue stripes of paint on the wall, tell us all about the development of The American Dream.

Inviting

The exhibition is an excellent introduction to American Realism. Although some aspects of American realist paintings have been omitted such as Precisionism, we are presented with a general overview from Impressionism to Regionalism, Social Realism, Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art and lots of other art forms.

The arrow on the facade of Kunsthalle Emden, inviting you in for The American Dream, will not be there for much longer, but there is still a quite astounding permanent collection.

 


The American Dream – part 1

The American Dream, Drents Museum Assen

Drents Museum Drents Museum, Assen – the Netherlands & the Kunsthalle, Emden – Germany 19-11-2017 – 27 May 2018

There seems to be a revival of interest in the art world for the artistic scene in the United States. In New York, the Metropolitan Museum is currently staging a retrospective of works by the 19th century realist landscape painter Thomas Cole and the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, UK will be showing an exhibition entitled America’s Cool Modernism featuring works by Georgia O’Keeffe, Edward Hopper and Charles Sheeler. Moreover, a show of the realist paintings of Andrew Wyeth has just been completed at the Seattle Art Museum in Seattle, Washington.The Drents Museum in the Netherlands, in cooperation with the Kunsthalle in Emden, Germany is presenting an overview of American realist paintings dating from 1945 through 2017, entitled The American Dream. We visited the Assen exhibition first.

This exhibition is a wonderful opportunity for Europeans to become more aware of what has been going on in the USA, partially in protest against the dominant abstract expressionism movement, best exemplified by Jackson Pollack and Willem de Kooning.

The introduction to realism in American art works depends in part on the historical context in which artists found themselves relative to art in America as such. For example, Thomas Cole was instrumental, along with Frederic Edwin Church and John Frederick Kensett in stimulating a new generation of 19th painters who opposed so-called academic realism.

At the same time, many artists in the States were confronted with a new style of painting emanating from Europe. The American reaction to European art was an attempt to create an ‘artistic language’ of their own. A ‘new academism’, initiated by Robert Henri, emerged in favor of a more realistic style.

Later, Henri became a teacher at the Art Students League of New York, one of his students being Edward Hopper who is one of the stars of the Assen exhibition. As a consequence of Henri’s influence, Hopper retained the realistic style with an impressionistic flavor. He went to Paris to see for himself what was going on and was influenced by the works of Edouard Manet and Edgar Degas. In his Burlington Magazine article on Hopper, David Anfam says that in the face of cubism, surrealism and abstract expressionism, Hopper was ‘bellweather of 20th-century culture’ and that he ‘concentrated on the relationship between the self and reality, the watchers and the watched’.

Every-day American life

Hopper, however, never wanted to join the group of American realist painters, depicting every day American life in rural areas and in urban centers. Artists belonging to this rural landscape style, also shown in the Assen exhibition are the early 20th century artists, Charles Burchfield, the brothers Moses and Raphael Soyer, Norman Rockwell, Andrew Wyeth and Thomas Hart Benton.

The last-named was probably the most famous of these early 20th century realist artists. His ‘Homestead’, shown in Assen, is a strong semblance of loneliness in rural America.  The picture consists of a farmer sitting on the edge of a brick well, three hogs eating their meal and in the distance an old-fashioned windmill next to a shed with an isolated tree in the background.

We can also see Charles E. Burchfield’s ‘November Railroad Mood’, a magical realistic depiction of a gathering storm in the background and a railroad line in the foreground. The watercolor is done in black and white with shades of grey.

Meanwhile, the realist painter with the longest longevity in this genre, Andrew Wyeth, is represented here by several paintings including ‘McVey’s Barn’ and ‘Toll Rope’. These works were done with tempera, or egg yolk and oil, which provide intimate detail and great clarity, showing his great love for his surroundings, for what we would assume to be everyday common objects. His most famous and mysterious work, ‘Christine’s World’, is not included in the exhibition, but there is his ‘Barraccon’ which shows his model and secret lover Helga Testorf lying on a couch with her back towards the viewer.The work is done as if she were the black maid who worked at his neighbor’s farm. That it was of Helga remained a secret.

Abstract Expressionism

A great majority of the American artists being shown in this exhibition were born before 1945. Only a few of these, however, were able to withstand the influence of the dominant style, abstract expressionism. Both Andrew Wyeth and Edward Hopper did retain their respective styles throughout their career. The brothers Moses and Ralph Soyer stuck decidedly to their version of social realism, otherwise called urban realism.

Artists such as Fairfield Porter, John McCoy, Charles Burchfield (1893-1967) and Robert Mirmelin are known primarily for their concentration on specific themes, domestic scenes in the case of Porter, and landscapes in the cases of McCoy and Burchfield.

Porter’s ‘A Day Indoors’ is typically a relaxed domestic scene, but in colors not encountered in most homes at the time. John McCoy’s ‘Four O’clock Train’ and ‘Brandywine at Twin Bridges’, both in tempera, are unusually precise in a display of nature at its best. Mirmelin stresses urban landscapes ranging from ‘A Subway Experience’ to ‘Landscape Homage to C.D. Friedrich’ and the ‘Metaphysical Rock Group’.

Alice Neel, Alex Katz  and Will Barnet express an obvious movement from figurative representation to abstract expressionism. Neel, for example, moves from the detailed portrait ‘Portrait of Raphael Soyer’ to the still life ‘Black Bottles’ where form is emphasized at the cost of detail.  Katz, for his part, has managed to incorporate both realism and abstract expressionism in the portrait of his wife, entitled ’Ade’. This development in style is also exhibited by Will Barnet’s more abstract ‘Woman Reading’ as against ‘Upstairs’, both of which show a rather abstract look wherein the first may evoke a smile and the last – possibly – a tear.

Photography

In the latter part of the 20th century, the Assen exhibition shows us that photography enters the art scene thereby enhancing realism as the choice of style rather than abstract expressionism. Especially Brunelli establishes photo realism as an art form in his work ‘Court Chenage’. He is applying the method of photo realism, whereby the content shown in a photograph is the source which is then reproduced piecemeal by using oils applied to canvas. His photo realism follows Andy Warhol’s pop art. This style coincides with methods also used by Richard Estes in his work ‘The Candy Store’ and by Ralph Goings in his ‘A1Saiuce’.

In addition to a stunning show in a compact space, there are associated life-sized photographs of major events and historically-important persons in the period as if to demonstrate the relationship between artistic content and reality in the United States.

The work of Chuck Close stands out among the realist artists mentioned above, because his portraits are constructed out of hundreds of pieces taken from photographs. However, one of his planned exhibitions was cancelled in May this year because of sexual abuse allegations made as part of the #Me Too movement. Mr. Close denies the allegations.

Catalogue

Mr. Harry Tupan of the Drents Museum and Mr. Stefan Borchardt of Kunsthalle in Emden, directors of the respective museums, in the introduction to the very useful catalogue say that The American Dream is ‘the first presentation of American realist art in Europe’.

The catalogue consists of a preface, a brief overview of American realism from 1945 to the present, and five chapters devoted to specific themes such as portraits, urban social realism, landscapes, daily life and still lifes. It also provides an overview of the artists in the show including pictures, but one artist, Charles Burchfield is overlooked. In addition, it would be helpful if the catalogue included an index wherein page references would be made to the works of the artists shown.

We are looking forward to our visit to Emden to see the other part of The American Dream.


Downton Abbey

A royal visit

Who does not know the TV series Downton Abbey about the 1920s and the aftermath of World War I and – of course – about the aristocratic Crawley family and their staff with the huge mansion at the scene of their intimate chats, intrigues, and stolen kisses. Highclere Castle, Newbury, is again the scene and so is its 1,000-acre estate, made by the famous 18th century landscape designer Capability Brown, with its cedar trees – some of them older than 250 years – giving the gardens extra grandeur. The English hills, the steam engine train crossing them, the mail coach and the cobblestone streets are delightful to the eye.

Two aristocrats, the earl and countess of Carnarvon, are still living in the castle that they used to hire out for weddings in order to be able to maintain their residence. Their worries must be over as today their mansion receives thousands of visitors a day, some of them taking tours that include a traditional afternoon tea and a tour guide to lead them through the mansion and gardens (£ 125 a person). No wonder the film theatre Tuschinski in Amsterdam was packed at the premiere of the film Downton Abbey, based on the TV series. A Universal Pictures speaker calls the series ‘a copious meal’ and he regards the film as ’the desert that is so delicious that you are glad you ordered it’.

For the film, Fellowes needed a dramatic device that would ‘bring all the characters together’, he tells Christiane Amanpour in a CNN interview (20 September 2019). He needed a central storyline. He had read about the visit to Yorkshire of George V and Mary. Suddenly it had struck him: ‘This is it’. He also remarks that Downton Abbey has always referred to actual events like the differences between classes, male and female rights, republicans and monarchists.

Both the Crawleys and their servants are preparing for this royal visit, all with determination. Not all with the same kind of eagerness, though. Does the royal staff want to take over at Downton? Are you kidding? Apart from the hustle and bustle of cleaning windows, polishing silver, and selecting the wines, there is enough food for romance, intrigue and mischief. And power, not only of the high class Crawley family, but also of their loyal and creative servants in the basement.

They are back

Is the storyline in the film thinner than in the TV-series? Who cares? They are back. We welcome Dame Maggie Smith again as the invincible Countess of Grantham who – with her unique sense of drama – exclaims ‘the nation should be brightened with glamour’. She certainly lights up the room as always. As Julian Fellowes in his CNN interview with Christiane Amanpour (20 September 2019) points out, he loves working with her as ‘Maggie always hits the button’.

Of course, Hugh Bonneville and Elizabeth McGovern as the Earl and Countess of Grantham are here again and so are Michelle Dockery and Laura Carmichael as their daughters Lady Mary and Edith. Penelope Wilton as Cousin Isobel is as witty as ever and has clearly decided to sharpen her retorts to the Countess. Furthermore, a new star enters the scene, the Oscar-nominated actress Imelda Staunton as Lady Maud Bagshaw, who happens to be married to Jim Carter, the famous butler, Mr. Carson at Downton.

A blanket to curl up in

Why do we love both the series and the film so much, Amanpour wonders. Fellowes responds that there may be several reasons for this. Although society was changing radically at the time, the 1920s may look like ‘quite settled’ to us, given that we live in such an ‘unsettling world’ ourselves. Both the TV series and the film show a romanticized idea of what ‘Britishness’ was and – to some – should be returned to.

Fellowes adds that Downton Abbey is about ‘the artificial relationship between you and the characters’. Do you want to relish seeing them again next week? According to Fellowes, both the upstairs and downstairs characters are ‘relatable’. Besides, the TV-series gave us ‘a blanket to curl up in on Sunday nights’, which Amanpour heartily confirms by replying that we all want to ‘snuggle in’.

During stately parades and glamorous balls and – naturally – in the Downton Abbey kitchen downstairs we find the ingredients that give a specific taste to the tongue: envy, rebellion, treason, class distinction, theft, rivalry, sexuality, pump and circumstance, trouble about an inheritance, but of course also bravery, loyalty, friendship, love and in the end, during a dance, all is well that ends well for both the Crawleys and their staff.

film: Downton Abbey
year: 2019
genre: costume drama
runtime: 122 min.
country: UK
language: English
based on a TV series, written by Julian Fellowes film
director: Michael Engler
nominated for an Emmy Award: 69 times
three Golden Globe Awards scene: Highclere Castle in Hampshire, England (architect: Charles Barry)
distributor: Universal Pictures Amsterdam

cast: Hugh Bonneville, Laura Carmichael, Allen Leech, Michelle Dockery, Elizabeth McGovern, Maggie Smith, Robert James-Colliler, Joanne Froggatt, Jim Carter, Imelda Staunton, Geraldine James, Simon Jones, David Haig, Matthew Goode


Disobedience

Freedom and Commitment: Disobedience?

Ronit Arushka (Rachel Weisz) and Esti Kuperman (Rachel McAdams) were involved in a friendship in their early youth, which – because of its extreme intimacy – was not appreciated by their Jewish Orthodox community. Ronit, now a sophisticated soft beauty, moved to New York where she became a photographer, while Esti, now an attractive but still a relatively plain housewife and teacher at a local school in Hendon, England, seemed to be quite happy with her life.

The relative peace in the lives of Ronit and Esti became radically disrupted when Ronit’s father Rav Krushka (Anton Lesser) suddenly passed away. As a rabbi in the Synagogue he was just explaining before the congregation how humans with their freedom of choice differed from purely spiritual angels and from animals with their instinctual desires when he collapsed and died soon afterwards.

Ronit felt she had to return because – in spite of their earlier differences – she did love her father and as her mother had died earlier, she was the supposed heir of his estate. She, nevertheless, dreaded to come back to the customs and religious duties of the Jewish Orthodox community. At the funeral reception she was received with cool apprehension.

Esti, for her part, was greatly upset upon Ronit’s arrival as it reignited her attraction to her. She, however, was now married and accepted as an integral part of this community. Later during a joyous dinner a pall was cast over the table when she suddenly expressed her feeling against the custom of women having to give up their last names at marriage.

Ronit, feeling ill at ease, left the house only to be followed by Esti. They walked together for some time. Eventually they came to an empty playground and their passions got the better of them. Just as this event took place, a couple from the congregation appeared and exclaimed, isn’t that Ronit and Esti.

The husband of Esti, Dovid Kuperman (Alessandro Nicola), was completely unaware of Esti’s dismay, even though family and friends found the situation more or less untenable. Everyone apparently knew that Ronit and Esti had crossed the line as far as their religion was concerned with the apparent exception of Dovid.

Dilemma

When Ronit was advised by her uncle Moshe Hartog (Allan Corduner) that her father, with whom she had had little contact, had bequeathed all his belongings and estate to the synagogue, she realized there was no further reason for her to stay. She was surprised at the passion that Esti still appeared to have for her, but received it with pleasure. Director Sebastian Lelio presents us with the dilemma. What was Esti going to do? Because of Esti’s relationship with Ronit her husband Dovid felt he could no longer become a rabbi, so: was Esti going to stay with him after all? She had just learned that she was with child. But she had demanded her freedom from Dovid and he had granted it to her. He understood that Esti was not happy with their marriage. Was she going to renounce it and return to New York with Ronit? What to do with her passionate love for Ronit? Perhaps Dovid’s decision to refuse the rabbiate would change her mind and she would stay with him.

The film delves into the complexities of intimate relationships, especially gay relationships, implicit when occurring within a strictly regulated culture such as Jewish Orthodoxy. Perhaps greater liberalization is needed with respect to traditional customs and religious belief? With Rabbi Krushka’s sermon of freedom of choice in mind we wonder what Esti’s decision will be. To be human is to choose and to choose is to be free.

director : Sebastian Lelio
producers: Frida Terresblanco, Ed Guiney and Rachel Weisz
screenplay: Sebastian Lelio and Rebecca Lenkiewicz adaptation from novel by Naomi Alderman
runtime: 114 minutes
photography: Danny Cohen BSC
editor: Nathan Nugent
music: Matthew Herbert
casting: Nine Gold
production: Film Nation Entertainment, Film4, Element Pictures LC6Prodjuctions and Braven Film
distributor: Sony Pictures Releasing


Getting Bush Back Together with the Europeans will be Sensitive Work

There is general agreement in the editorials of two major Dutch newspapers that the best thing which happened during the visit of Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende and Foreign Minister Jaap de Hoop Scheffer with President George W Bush on Tuesday was the announcement by Bush that more cooperation would be sought from the United Nations in Iraq.

The NRC Handelsblad makes two comments worth mentioning. In the first instance, the editorial on 4 September 2003 says: ‘ The United States has demonstrated they could easily defeat Iraq and Afghanistan with military power and remove both regimes.’  Now, however, the United States has need of its allies and of the United Nations in order to successfully round off their victory.’

Secondly, the actual implementation of a United Nations Security Council resolution which would involve the larger community in the Political, economic and military aftermath of Iraq, is a ‘basket of eggs’. The French and Germans will put tough conditions on any contribution and it is not good for the United Nations itself to become aligned directly with the military machine of the United States.  Nevertheless, says the NRC Handelsblad, ‘the best news in months is the return of the United Nations to the world stage.’

The leader of De Volkskrant to its editorial devoted to the Bush United Nations decision says that Bush has ’gone on his knees’. Mr. Bush has returned to the United Nations as the ‘asking’ and not as the ‘demanding’ country.  Unlike the beginning of the war, ‘France possesses, with its veto vote, the key to an international rescue operation by the United Nations’.

The editorial on 5 September 2003 cautions President Jacques Chirac of France to make the right choice.  ‘One certainly hopes that Chirac, who has a habit of overestimating himself, is able to correctly assess the situation.’ Whether or not it is Bush who makes concessions by the involvement of the United Nations, or Chirac or Chancellor Gerhard Schröder of Germany, the most important of all, says the editorial ‘…is to ensure that no one will give the remnants of the Hussein regime or Muslim terrorists a new chance to win the war.’

Weitzel & Company